I. INTRODUCTION
The
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Vision for the Future (as stated in the 1998
annual report) is to “provide for a wide variety of public land uses without
compromising the long term health and diversity of the land and without sacrificing
significant natural, cultural, and historical resource values”. The Director’s letter goes on to state, “We seek close partnerships with state and
local governments, Indian tribes, other Federal agencies, and all of our
publics, as we embrace a process that addresses all of the physical,
biological, economic, and social aspects of land and resource management…guided
by…a vision that emphasizes public land health and preservation.”
The BLM San Juan
Field Office is the regulatory agency responsible for preserving the health of
Federal public lands in southwestern Colorado, while regulating responsible
resource development and serving Southern Ute Indian Tribal mineral interests
under the trust responsibility delegated by Congress. This paper focuses on the
issues currently facing the San Juan Field Office that relate to Fruitland
coalbed methane production and conceivably associated environmental
implications. This document will be
foundational for documenting historical evidence regarding CBM development in
the northern San Juan Basin. It will
also serve as a basis for interim decisions concerning gas well drilling on
both Federal and Indian mineral leaseholds until basin hydrology and reservoir
modeling provide forecasting scenarios that will facilitate development
planning. It informs the public of
current theories linking Fruitland Basin production to Fruitland outcrop
impacts. It provides a basis for discussion and determination of the type and
timing of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation necessary to
address impacts (both at current spacing and potential infill drilling). Finally, this paper documents the need to
consider prudent outcrop responses including the issues of private property,
off-lease impacts, possible mitigation solutions including cost, responsibility
and liability.
While
the Fruitland Coalbeds were known to contain significant gas reserves, the
understanding and technology of producing that gas was not available to earlier
gas well developers. Therefore, the
stratigraphically shallower Fruitland coals had been penetrated in the early
days of gas exploration in the Basin, but bypassed in preference to deeper
geologic horizons offering conventional gas reservoirs that more readily
yielded the natural gas resource. The
development of unconventional coalbed methane in the Fruitland Formation of the
Northern San Juan Basin (Basin) in Colorado began in earnest in the late
1980s. This paper presents highlights
of coalbed methane development history and associated issues in the Northern
San Juan Basin, Colorado. This
development has been administered by the overlapping jurisdictions of the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), Southern Ute
Indian Tribe (SUIT), Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC), and
to some extent La Plata County.
This
paper also presents and documents recent environmental problems associated with
coalbed methane production. Unlike conventional reservoirs, where methane gas
is stored in the pore spaces of the formation, considerable coalbed methane is
stored on (adsorbed to) the surfaces of the coal matrix and is not free to
migrate until pressure is relieved.
Even in the coalbeds, though, some free gas is present in pore space and
may collect in typical structural traps.
In general, hydrostatic head provides the pressure that keeps the
majority of the coalgas adsorbed. Once
coalbed gas is liberated by the withdrawal of water reducing the hydrostatic
head, the methane (estimated at over 50 trillion standard cubic feet (TSCF) in
the Fruitland Coalbeds) is free to migrate.
Inadequately cemented conventional gas well bores and extraction of
produced water from coalbed methane (CBM) wells are suspected of contributing
to natural gas resource losses and to methane migration into surface soils and
groundwater.
As
methane production progressed, some residents noticed an apparent increase in
the occurrence of methane in their domestic water wells, while others also
noticed the presence of gas seeps in pastures, manifested by dead
vegetation. During the next few years,
other events were noticed that time-correlated with recent coalbed methane
(CBM) production.
Anoxic
environments created in near-surface regimes by a predominance of methane
support bacterial generation of hydrogen sulfide gas and promote plant
suffocation by precluding soil oxygen.
Methane from soil gas vapors can accumulate in confined spaces, such as
beneath domestic dwellings, and may pose potential explosion hazards. Along the Basin rim where the Fruitland
coals crop out, intensified gas seepage and an associated apparent escalation
in hydrogen sulfide gas has been reported at historic seep sites. Stands of stressed and dying trees were
discovered aligned with coalbeds beneath.
North of the Southern Ute Indian Reservation, two homes located directly
above the outcrop/subcrop of the Fruitland Formation coalbeds were declared
unsafe for habitation due to explosive accumulations of methane; five homes
were ultimately removed from the hazardous zone.
Self-heating of near-surface coals can result from fluctuations/lowering of the water table in the coalbeds. On the Southern Ute Indian Reservation several coal fires have been identified during 1998-99. Geologic evidence indicates that pre-historic Fruitland coalbed fires existed in similar locales. The time of ignition or resurgence of current coal fires is virtually impossible to ascertain. The most disconcerting instance (due to speculation of a possible proliferation of coal bed fires) is a coal fire detected in the fall of 1998 at a location approximately eight miles north of active coal fires first noticed during the spring of 1998. These environmentally significant phenomena, which may represent warning signs of impending changes, have engaged the attention of regulatory agencies and the community.